Twelve things we have learned about diagnosing middle market businesses
Most performance problems are governance problems wearing operational costumes.
The constraint is rarely where the dashboard points.
If the founder is in three of the top ten recurring decisions, the business has a structural ceiling on growth.
A standard the management team does not enforce is not a standard. It is a suggestion.
Documentation is not discipline. Discipline is what maintains the documentation.
Decision latency is the hidden tax on the operation, and it does not appear on any standard report.
The data the operator hands over is a description of how the operator already sees the business. The diagnosis lives in what is missing from that data.
Most middle market businesses cannot tell you, with specificity, what their back office actually does. The inventory is the first finding.
Quality of earnings tells you whether the historical numbers are real. It does not tell you whether the operation can absorb a transaction.
A roadmap that lists everything is a fiction. The middle market does not have the bandwidth to execute against more than two or three real initiatives at a time.
Brand is not what you say. It is what your operation can repeat.
The customer experience that compounds is the one the customer cannot articulate.
These are not theories. They are field notes.
- DIAGNOSTIC
The Composition Diagnostic
Most middle market businesses have been assessed before. The assessments produced documents. The documents identified problems. The problems mostly persisted. This is not because the assessors were wrong. It is because an assessment is not a diagnostic, and the two have been conflated for so long that operators no longer expect the distinction to matter.
5 MIN READ - DIAGNOSTIC
What a real diagnostic looks like
An assessment describes what is happening. A diagnostic identifies what is causing it. The two have been conflated for so long that operators no longer expect the distinction to matter. It does.
3 MIN READ